1977 Mazda 818 vs. 2000 Seat Inca Kombi
To start off, 2000 Seat Inca Kombi is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Mazda 818. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Mazda 818 would be higher. At 1,391 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Seat Inca Kombi is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1977 Mazda 818 (68 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 2000 Seat Inca Kombi. (59 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1977 Mazda 818 should accelerate faster than 2000 Seat Inca Kombi. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Seat Inca Kombi weights approximately 35 kg more than 1977 Mazda 818.
Because 1977 Mazda 818 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1977 Mazda 818. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Seat Inca Kombi, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Seat Inca Kombi (107 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Mazda 818. (92 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2000 Seat Inca Kombi will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Mazda 818.
Compare all specifications:
1977 Mazda 818 | 2000 Seat Inca Kombi | |
Make | Mazda | Seat |
Model | 818 | Inca Kombi |
Year Released | 1977 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1271 cc | 1391 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 68 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 92 Nm | 107 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 1035 kg |