1977 Mazda 818 vs. 2001 Mazda CU-X

To start off, 2001 Mazda CU-X is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Mazda 818. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Mazda 818 would be higher. At 1,970 cc, 2001 Mazda CU-X is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Mazda CU-X (99 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 1977 Mazda 818. (68 HP @ 6200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Mazda CU-X should accelerate faster than 1977 Mazda 818. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mazda CU-X weights approximately 345 kg more than 1977 Mazda 818. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1977 Mazda 818 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1977 Mazda 818. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mazda CU-X, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Mazda CU-X (240 Nm) has 148 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Mazda 818. (92 Nm). This means 2001 Mazda CU-X will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Mazda 818.

Compare all specifications: