1977 Mazda 929 vs. 1996 Renault Clio
To start off, 1996 Renault Clio is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Renault Clio (250 HP) has 167 more horse power than 1977 Mazda 929. (83 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1977 Mazda 929. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Renault Clio weights approximately 576 kg more than 1977 Mazda 929. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Renault Clio (407 Nm) has 273 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Mazda 929. (134 Nm). This means 1996 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Mazda 929.
Compare all specifications:
| 1977 Mazda 929 | 1996 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Mazda | Renault |
| Model | 929 | Clio |
| Year Released | 1977 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1769 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 83 HP | 250 HP |
| Torque | 134 Nm | 407 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1074 kg | 1650 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1640 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2490 mm |
