1977 Mazda 929 vs. 2000 Volvo S60
To start off, 2000 Volvo S60 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 2,434 cc (5 cylinders), 2000 Volvo S60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Volvo S60 (138 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 1977 Mazda 929. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Volvo S60 should accelerate faster than 1977 Mazda 929. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Volvo S60 weights approximately 290 kg more than 1977 Mazda 929. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1977 Mazda 929 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1977 Mazda 929. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Volvo S60, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Volvo S60 (220 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 83 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Mazda 929. (137 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2000 Volvo S60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Mazda 929.
Compare all specifications:
1977 Mazda 929 | 2000 Volvo S60 | |
Make | Mazda | Volvo |
Model | 929 | S60 |
Year Released | 1977 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1768 cc | 2434 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 83 HP | 138 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 137 Nm | 220 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.6:1 | 10.3:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1135 kg | 1425 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2670 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 70 L |