1977 Mazda 929 vs. 2002 Toyota Camry
To start off, 2002 Toyota Camry is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 2,995 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Toyota Camry is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Toyota Camry (180 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 97 more horse power than 1977 Mazda 929. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Toyota Camry should accelerate faster than 1977 Mazda 929. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Toyota Camry weights approximately 325 kg more than 1977 Mazda 929. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1977 Mazda 929 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1977 Mazda 929. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Toyota Camry, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Toyota Camry (279 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 142 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Mazda 929. (137 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2002 Toyota Camry will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Mazda 929.
Compare all specifications:
| 1977 Mazda 929 | 2002 Toyota Camry | |
| Make | Mazda | Toyota |
| Model | 929 | Camry |
| Year Released | 1977 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1768 cc | 2995 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 83 HP | 180 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 137 Nm | 279 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 87.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 83 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.6:1 | 10.5:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1135 kg | 1460 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2610 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 70 L |
