1977 Mazda 929 vs. 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 3,701 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 793 kg more than 1977 Mazda 929.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee has automatic transmission and 1977 Mazda 929 has manual transmission. 1977 Mazda 929 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1977 Mazda 929 | 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | Mazda | Jeep |
Model | 929 | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 1977 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1970 cc | 3701 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 210 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1185 kg | 1978 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2790 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 80 L |