1977 Mazda 929 vs. 2010 Chevrolet Orlando
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Orlando is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Chevrolet Orlando is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chevrolet Orlando (128 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 1977 Mazda 929. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Orlando should accelerate faster than 1977 Mazda 929. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Chevrolet Orlando weights approximately 591 kg more than 1977 Mazda 929. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Chevrolet Orlando (315 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 181 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Mazda 929. (134 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2010 Chevrolet Orlando will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Mazda 929.
Compare all specifications:
1977 Mazda 929 | 2010 Chevrolet Orlando | |
Make | Mazda | Chevrolet |
Model | 929 | Orlando |
Year Released | 1977 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1769 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 83 HP | 128 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 134 Nm | 315 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 86 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1074 kg | 1665 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4652 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1836 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1633 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2760 mm |