1977 Mazda RX-2 vs. 2001 MG X10
To start off, 2001 MG X10 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 MG X10 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 MG X10 (195 HP) has 77 more horse power than 1977 Mazda RX-2. (118 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2001 MG X10 should accelerate faster than 1977 Mazda RX-2.
Because 1977 Mazda RX-2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1977 Mazda RX-2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 MG X10, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1977 Mazda RX-2 | 2001 MG X10 | |
| Make | Mazda | MG |
| Model | RX-2 | X10 |
| Year Released | 1977 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2292 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | V |
| Horse Power | 118 HP | 195 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
