1977 Mazda RX-2 vs. 2003 Mazda 2
To start off, 2003 Mazda 2 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 2,292 cc, 1977 Mazda RX-2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1977 Mazda RX-2 (118 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 2003 Mazda 2. (104 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1977 Mazda RX-2 should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda 2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mazda 2 weights approximately 120 kg more than 1977 Mazda RX-2.
Because 1977 Mazda RX-2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1977 Mazda RX-2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1977 Mazda RX-2 (157 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Mazda 2. (146 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1977 Mazda RX-2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Mazda 2.
Compare all specifications:
1977 Mazda RX-2 | 2003 Mazda 2 | |
Make | Mazda | Mazda |
Model | RX-2 | 2 |
Year Released | 1977 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2292 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 157 Nm | 146 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 1080 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 3930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2500 mm |