1977 Mazda RX-2 vs. 2005 Volvo S40
To start off, 2005 Volvo S40 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 2,520 cc (5 cylinders), 2005 Volvo S40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Volvo S40 (218 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 100 more horse power than 1977 Mazda RX-2. (118 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Volvo S40 should accelerate faster than 1977 Mazda RX-2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Volvo S40 weights approximately 465 kg more than 1977 Mazda RX-2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Volvo S40 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1977 Mazda RX-2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Volvo S40 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Volvo S40 (320 Nm) has 163 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Mazda RX-2. (157 Nm). This means 2005 Volvo S40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Mazda RX-2.
Compare all specifications:
1977 Mazda RX-2 | 2005 Volvo S40 | |
Make | Mazda | Volvo |
Model | RX-2 | S40 |
Year Released | 1977 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2292 cc | 2520 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 218 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 157 Nm | 320 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 1425 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 4470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2650 mm |