1977 Mazda RX-2 vs. 2012 Audi R8
To start off, 2012 Audi R8 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 4,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Audi R8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi R8 (420 HP) has 302 more horse power than 1977 Mazda RX-2. (118 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi R8 should accelerate faster than 1977 Mazda RX-2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Audi R8 weights approximately 675 kg more than 1977 Mazda RX-2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2012 Audi R8 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1977 Mazda RX-2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi R8 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Audi R8 (430 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 273 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Mazda RX-2. (157 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2012 Audi R8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Mazda RX-2.
Compare all specifications:
1977 Mazda RX-2 | 2012 Audi R8 | |
Make | Mazda | Audi |
Model | RX-2 | R8 |
Year Released | 1977 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2292 cc | 4200 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | V |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 420 HP |
Torque | 157 Nm | 430 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 1635 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 4435 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1252 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2649 mm |