1977 Mazda RX-3 vs. 2000 Mitsubishi SSU
To start off, 2000 Mitsubishi SSU is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Mazda RX-3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Mazda RX-3 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Mitsubishi SSU is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Mitsubishi SSU (119 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1977 Mazda RX-3. (100 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Mitsubishi SSU should accelerate faster than 1977 Mazda RX-3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mitsubishi SSU weights approximately 1053 kg more than 1977 Mazda RX-3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Mitsubishi SSU is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1977 Mazda RX-3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mitsubishi SSU will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Mitsubishi SSU (240 Nm) has 105 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Mazda RX-3. (135 Nm). This means 2000 Mitsubishi SSU will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Mazda RX-3.
Compare all specifications:
1977 Mazda RX-3 | 2000 Mitsubishi SSU | |
Make | Mazda | Mitsubishi |
Model | RX-3 | SSU |
Year Released | 1977 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1964 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | V |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 119 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 135 Nm | 240 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 852 kg | 1905 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2570 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 71 L |