1977 Mazda RX-3 vs. 2000 Suzuki XL6
To start off, 2000 Suzuki XL6 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Mazda RX-3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Mazda RX-3 would be higher. At 2,501 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Suzuki XL6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1977 Mazda RX-3 (100 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 2000 Suzuki XL6. (70 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1977 Mazda RX-3 should accelerate faster than 2000 Suzuki XL6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Suzuki XL6 weights approximately 593 kg more than 1977 Mazda RX-3.
Because 2000 Suzuki XL6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1977 Mazda RX-3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Suzuki XL6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Suzuki XL6 (218 Nm) has 83 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Mazda RX-3. (135 Nm). This means 2000 Suzuki XL6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Mazda RX-3.
Compare all specifications:
| 1977 Mazda RX-3 | 2000 Suzuki XL6 | |
| Make | Mazda | Suzuki |
| Model | RX-3 | XL6 |
| Year Released | 1977 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1964 cc | 2501 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | V |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 70 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 135 Nm | 218 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 852 kg | 1445 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4090 mm | 4190 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1730 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2490 mm |
