1977 Mazda RX-3 vs. 2002 Spyker C8
To start off, 2002 Spyker C8 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Mazda RX-3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Mazda RX-3 would be higher. At 4,172 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Spyker C8 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Spyker C8 weights approximately 366 kg more than 1977 Mazda RX-3.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1977 Mazda RX-3 | 2002 Spyker C8 | |
Make | Mazda | Spyker |
Model | RX-3 | C8 |
Year Released | 1977 | 2002 |
Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1964 cc | 4172 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 852 kg | 1218 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4090 mm | 4190 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1250 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2560 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 100 L |