1977 Mazda RX-3 vs. 2010 Peugeot 5008
To start off, 2010 Peugeot 5008 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Mazda RX-3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Mazda RX-3 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Peugeot 5008 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Peugeot 5008 (161 HP @ 3750 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 1977 Mazda RX-3. (100 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Peugeot 5008 should accelerate faster than 1977 Mazda RX-3.
Because 1977 Mazda RX-3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1977 Mazda RX-3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Peugeot 5008, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Peugeot 5008 (340 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 205 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Mazda RX-3. (135 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2010 Peugeot 5008 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Mazda RX-3.
Compare all specifications:
1977 Mazda RX-3 | 2010 Peugeot 5008 | |
Make | Mazda | Peugeot |
Model | RX-3 | 5008 |
Year Released | 1977 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1964 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 161 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Torque | 135 Nm | 340 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4090 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1835 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2735 mm |