1977 Mazda RX-3 vs. 2012 Peugeot 508
To start off, 2012 Peugeot 508 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Mazda RX-3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Mazda RX-3 would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1977 Mazda RX-3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Peugeot 508 (154 HP) has 54 more horse power than 1977 Mazda RX-3. (100 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Peugeot 508 should accelerate faster than 1977 Mazda RX-3.
Because 1977 Mazda RX-3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1977 Mazda RX-3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Peugeot 508, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1977 Mazda RX-3 | 2012 Peugeot 508 | |
Make | Mazda | Peugeot |
Model | RX-3 | 508 |
Year Released | 1977 | 2012 |
Body Type | Coupe | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1964 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 154 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4090 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1853 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1456 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2817 mm |