1977 Mazda RX-4 vs. 1960 Toyota Master RR
To start off, 1977 Mazda RX-4 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Toyota Master RR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Toyota Master RR would be higher. At 2,616 cc, 1977 Mazda RX-4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1977 Mazda RX-4 (114 HP) has 74 more horse power than 1960 Toyota Master RR. (40 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1977 Mazda RX-4 should accelerate faster than 1960 Toyota Master RR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Toyota Master RR weights approximately 100 kg more than 1977 Mazda RX-4.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1977 Mazda RX-4 | 1960 Toyota Master RR | |
Make | Mazda | Toyota |
Model | RX-4 | Master RR |
Year Released | 1977 | 1960 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2616 cc | 1453 cc |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 40 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1210 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 4280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2540 mm |