1977 Mazda RX-4 vs. 1980 Toyota Tercel
To start off, 1980 Toyota Tercel is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Mazda RX-4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Mazda RX-4 would be higher. At 2,616 cc, 1977 Mazda RX-4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1977 Mazda RX-4 (114 HP) has 44 more horse power than 1980 Toyota Tercel. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1977 Mazda RX-4 should accelerate faster than 1980 Toyota Tercel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1977 Mazda RX-4 weights approximately 290 kg more than 1980 Toyota Tercel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1977 Mazda RX-4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1977 Mazda RX-4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Toyota Tercel, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1977 Mazda RX-4 | 1980 Toyota Tercel | |
| Make | Mazda | Toyota |
| Model | RX-4 | Tercel |
| Year Released | 1977 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2616 cc | 1295 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 70 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 820 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 3970 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1560 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2510 mm |
