1977 Mazda RX-4 vs. 1995 Xedos 6
To start off, 1995 Xedos 6 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Mazda RX-4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Mazda RX-4 would be higher. At 2,616 cc, 1977 Mazda RX-4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1977 Mazda RX-4 (114 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1995 Xedos 6. (106 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1977 Mazda RX-4 should accelerate faster than 1995 Xedos 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Xedos 6 weights approximately 30 kg more than 1977 Mazda RX-4.
Because 1977 Mazda RX-4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1977 Mazda RX-4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Xedos 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1977 Mazda RX-4 (165 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Xedos 6. (138 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1977 Mazda RX-4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Xedos 6.
Compare all specifications:
1977 Mazda RX-4 | 1995 Xedos 6 | |
Make | Mazda | Xedos |
Model | RX-4 | 6 |
Year Released | 1977 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2616 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 106 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 165 Nm | 138 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1140 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 4570 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2620 mm |