1977 Mazda RX-4 vs. 2004 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2004 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Mazda RX-4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Mazda RX-4 would be higher. At 3,950 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota 4Runner (245 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 131 more horse power than 1977 Mazda RX-4. (114 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1977 Mazda RX-4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 810 kg more than 1977 Mazda RX-4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Toyota 4Runner (382 Nm) has 217 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Mazda RX-4. (165 Nm). This means 2004 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Mazda RX-4.
Compare all specifications:
| 1977 Mazda RX-4 | 2004 Toyota 4Runner | |
| Make | Mazda | Toyota |
| Model | RX-4 | 4Runner |
| Year Released | 1977 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2616 cc | 3950 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | V |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 245 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 165 Nm | 382 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1920 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 4810 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1880 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1830 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2830 mm |
