1977 Mazda RX-4 vs. 2009 Volvo XC70
To start off, 2009 Volvo XC70 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Mazda RX-4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Mazda RX-4 would be higher. At 2,953 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Volvo XC70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Volvo XC70 (281 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 167 more horse power than 1977 Mazda RX-4. (114 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Volvo XC70 should accelerate faster than 1977 Mazda RX-4.
Because 2009 Volvo XC70 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1977 Mazda RX-4. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Volvo XC70 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Volvo XC70 (400 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 235 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Mazda RX-4. (165 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2009 Volvo XC70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Mazda RX-4.
Compare all specifications:
1977 Mazda RX-4 | 2009 Volvo XC70 | |
Make | Mazda | Volvo |
Model | RX-4 | XC70 |
Year Released | 1977 | 2009 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2616 cc | 2953 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 281 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 165 Nm | 400 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 4850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1610 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2820 mm |