1977 Mazda RX-4 vs. 2010 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2010 Holden Cruze is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Mazda RX-4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Mazda RX-4 would be higher. At 2,616 cc, 1977 Mazda RX-4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Cruze (148 HP) has 34 more horse power than 1977 Mazda RX-4. (114 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Cruze should accelerate faster than 1977 Mazda RX-4.
Because 1977 Mazda RX-4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1977 Mazda RX-4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Holden Cruze, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Cruze (320 Nm) has 155 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Mazda RX-4. (165 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Cruze will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Mazda RX-4.
Compare all specifications:
| 1977 Mazda RX-4 | 2010 Holden Cruze | |
| Make | Mazda | Holden |
| Model | RX-4 | Cruze |
| Year Released | 1977 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2616 cc | 1991 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 148 HP |
| Torque | 165 Nm | 320 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 4597 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1788 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1477 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2685 mm |
