1977 Mercedes-Benz E vs. 1992 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1992 Oldsmobile Cutlass is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Mercedes-Benz E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Mercedes-Benz E would be higher. At 3,135 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 115 kg more than 1977 Mercedes-Benz E.
Because 1977 Mercedes-Benz E is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1977 Mercedes-Benz E. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1992 Oldsmobile Cutlass has automatic transmission and 1977 Mercedes-Benz E has manual transmission. 1977 Mercedes-Benz E will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1992 Oldsmobile Cutlass will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1977 Mercedes-Benz E | 1992 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Oldsmobile |
Model | E | Cutlass |
Year Released | 1977 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1988 cc | 3135 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 138 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1375 kg | 1490 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 4930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2740 mm |