1977 Mercedes-Benz E vs. 2013 Cadillac ATS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac ATS is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Mercedes-Benz E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Mercedes-Benz E would be higher. At 2,525 cc (6 cylinders), 1977 Mercedes-Benz E is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac ATS weights approximately 168 kg more than 1977 Mercedes-Benz E.
Because 2013 Cadillac ATS is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1977 Mercedes-Benz E. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac ATS will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2013 Cadillac ATS has automatic transmission and 1977 Mercedes-Benz E has manual transmission. 1977 Mercedes-Benz E will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Cadillac ATS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1977 Mercedes-Benz E | 2013 Cadillac ATS | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Cadillac |
Model | E | ATS |
Year Released | 1977 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2525 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 268 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1362 kg | 1530 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 4643 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1806 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2776 mm |