1977 Mini MK IV vs. 2010 Dodge Dakota
To start off, 2010 Dodge Dakota is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Mini MK IV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Mini MK IV would be higher. At 3,701 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Dodge Dakota (207 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 173 more horse power than 1977 Mini MK IV. (34 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Dodge Dakota should accelerate faster than 1977 Mini MK IV.
Because 2010 Dodge Dakota is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Dodge Dakota. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1977 Mini MK IV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Dodge Dakota (236 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 175 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Mini MK IV. (61 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2010 Dodge Dakota will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Mini MK IV.
Compare all specifications:
1977 Mini MK IV | 2010 Dodge Dakota | |
Make | Mini | Dodge |
Model | MK IV | Dakota |
Year Released | 1977 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 848 cc | 3701 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 34 HP | 207 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 61 Nm | 236 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2900 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 5560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 3340 mm |