1977 Mitsubishi Celeste vs. 1999 Oldsmobile Alero
To start off, 1999 Oldsmobile Alero is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Mitsubishi Celeste. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Mitsubishi Celeste would be higher. At 2,392 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Oldsmobile Alero is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Oldsmobile Alero weights approximately 380 kg more than 1977 Mitsubishi Celeste.
Because 1977 Mitsubishi Celeste is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1977 Mitsubishi Celeste. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Oldsmobile Alero, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1977 Mitsubishi Celeste | 1999 Oldsmobile Alero | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Oldsmobile |
Model | Celeste | Alero |
Year Released | 1977 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 2392 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 148 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 990 kg | 1370 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2720 mm |