1977 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 2004 Smart ForTwo
To start off, 2004 Smart ForTwo is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 1,408 cc (4 cylinders), 1977 Mitsubishi Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1977 Mitsubishi Colt weights approximately 15 kg more than 2004 Smart ForTwo.
Because 2004 Smart ForTwo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Smart ForTwo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1977 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1977 Mitsubishi Colt | 2004 Smart ForTwo | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Smart |
| Model | Colt | ForTwo |
| Year Released | 1977 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1408 cc | 799 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 40 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 820 kg | 805 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3800 mm | 2510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1520 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 1820 mm |
