1977 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 2006 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2006 Ford Ecosport is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ecosport is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1977 Mitsubishi Colt | 2006 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Ford |
Model | Colt | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1977 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1408 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 109 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3800 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 2490 mm |