1977 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 2006 Toyota MR2
To start off, 2006 Toyota MR2 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 1,799 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Toyota MR2 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2006 Toyota MR2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Toyota MR2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1977 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1977 Mitsubishi Colt | 2006 Toyota MR2 | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Toyota |
| Model | Colt | MR2 |
| Year Released | 1977 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1408 cc | 1799 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 140 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 3800 mm | 3890 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1250 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 2460 mm |
