1977 Nissan 240 C vs. 2003 Volvo V50
To start off, 2003 Volvo V50 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Nissan 240 C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Nissan 240 C would be higher. At 2,435 cc (5 cylinders), 2003 Volvo V50 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Volvo V50 weights approximately 139 kg more than 1977 Nissan 240 C.
Because 1977 Nissan 240 C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1977 Nissan 240 C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Volvo V50, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2003 Volvo V50 has automatic transmission and 1977 Nissan 240 C has manual transmission. 1977 Nissan 240 C will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Volvo V50 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1977 Nissan 240 C | 2003 Volvo V50 | |
Make | Nissan | Volvo |
Model | 240 C | V50 |
Year Released | 1977 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1982 cc | 2435 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 161 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 1399 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2630 mm |