1977 Nissan 240 C vs. 2010 Seat Exeo
To start off, 2010 Seat Exeo is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Nissan 240 C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Nissan 240 C would be higher. At 1,982 cc (4 cylinders), 1977 Nissan 240 C is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Seat Exeo weights approximately 140 kg more than 1977 Nissan 240 C.
Because 1977 Nissan 240 C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1977 Nissan 240 C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Seat Exeo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1977 Nissan 240 C | 2010 Seat Exeo | |
Make | Nissan | Seat |
Model | 240 C | Exeo |
Year Released | 1977 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1982 cc | 1781 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 148 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 1400 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4661 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1772 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2642 mm |