1977 Nissan 240 C vs. 2013 Mazda 2
To start off, 2013 Mazda 2 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Nissan 240 C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Nissan 240 C would be higher. At 1,982 cc (4 cylinders), 1977 Nissan 240 C is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1977 Nissan 240 C weights approximately 217 kg more than 2013 Mazda 2.
Because 1977 Nissan 240 C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1977 Nissan 240 C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mazda 2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1977 Nissan 240 C | 2013 Mazda 2 | |
Make | Nissan | Mazda |
Model | 240 C | 2 |
Year Released | 1977 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1982 cc | 1498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 100 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 1043 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 3950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1694 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1476 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2489 mm |