1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 1966 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 5,798 cc (8 cylinders), 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass (125 HP) has 90 more horse power than 1966 Suzuki Fronte. (35 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass should accelerate faster than 1966 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 760 kg more than 1966 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 Suzuki Fronte, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 1966 Suzuki Fronte | |
| Make | Oldsmobile | Suzuki |
| Model | Cutlass | Fronte |
| Year Released | 1977 | 1966 |
| Engine Size | 5798 cc | 785 cc |
| Horse Power | 125 HP | 35 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1520 kg | 760 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 3880 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2250 mm |
