1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 1996 Acura TL
To start off, 1996 Acura TL is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 3,790 cc (6 cylinders), 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Acura TL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 1996 Acura TL | |
Make | Oldsmobile | Acura |
Model | Cutlass | TL |
Year Released | 1977 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3790 cc | 3200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 200 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4864 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1786 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1405 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2840 mm |