1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 2004 Oldsmobile Alero
To start off, 2004 Oldsmobile Alero is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 5,031 cc (8 cylinders), 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 162 kg more than 2004 Oldsmobile Alero.
Because 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Oldsmobile Alero, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 2004 Oldsmobile Alero | |
Make | Oldsmobile | Oldsmobile |
Model | Cutlass | Alero |
Year Released | 1977 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5031 cc | 2196 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 140 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1338 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5530 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2720 mm |