1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 2004 Volvo XC90

To start off, 2004 Volvo XC90 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 5,798 cc (8 cylinders), 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Volvo XC90 (268 HP) has 143 more horse power than 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (125 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Volvo XC90 should accelerate faster than 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 586 kg more than 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2004 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Volvo XC90 (380 Nm) has 74 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (306 Nm). This means 2004 Volvo XC90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass.

Compare all specifications: