1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 2005 Suzuki Alto
To start off, 2005 Suzuki Alto is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 3,790 cc (6 cylinders), 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 675 kg more than 2005 Suzuki Alto.
Because 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Suzuki Alto, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass has automatic transmission and 2005 Suzuki Alto has manual transmission. 2005 Suzuki Alto will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 2005 Suzuki Alto | |
Make | Oldsmobile | Suzuki |
Model | Cutlass | Alto |
Year Released | 1977 | 2005 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3790 cc | 1061 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 41 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 805 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 3300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1410 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2370 mm |