1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 2006 Renault Clio

To start off, 2006 Renault Clio is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 3,790 cc (6 cylinders), 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 450 kg more than 2006 Renault Clio.

Because 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass has automatic transmission and 2006 Renault Clio has manual transmission. 2006 Renault Clio will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass 2006 Renault Clio
Make Oldsmobile Renault
Model Cutlass Clio
Year Released 1977 2006
Body Type Coupe Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3790 cc 1390 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 0 HP 97 HP
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Automatic Manual
Vehicle Weight 1480 kg 1030 kg
Vehicle Length 5030 mm 3780 mm
Vehicle Width 1840 mm 1650 mm
Vehicle Height 1390 mm 1420 mm
Wheelbase Size 2760 mm 2690 mm