1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 2010 Cadillac DTS
To start off, 2010 Cadillac DTS is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Cadillac DTS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Cadillac DTS weights approximately 336 kg more than 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac DTS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 2010 Cadillac DTS | |
Make | Oldsmobile | Cadillac |
Model | Cutlass | DTS |
Year Released | 1977 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3790 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 275 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1482 kg | 1818 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 5273 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1463 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2936 mm |