1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 2010 Chevrolet HHR
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet HHR is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 3,790 cc (6 cylinders), 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 51 kg more than 2010 Chevrolet HHR.
Because 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet HHR, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass has automatic transmission and 2010 Chevrolet HHR has manual transmission. 2010 Chevrolet HHR will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 2010 Chevrolet HHR | |
Make | Oldsmobile | Chevrolet |
Model | Cutlass | HHR |
Year Released | 1977 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3790 cc | 2200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 155 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1482 kg | 1431 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4475 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1755 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1603 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2629 mm |