1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 2013 Ford C-MAX
To start off, 2013 Ford C-MAX is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 3,790 cc (6 cylinders), 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford C-MAX weights approximately 175 kg more than 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Ford C-MAX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 2013 Ford C-MAX | |
| Make | Oldsmobile | Ford |
| Model | Cutlass | C-MAX |
| Year Released | 1977 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3790 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 139 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | CVT |
| Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1655 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5530 mm | 4409 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 2085 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1623 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2649 mm |
