1977 Oldsmobile Omega vs. 1996 Ford Mustang
To start off, 1996 Ford Mustang is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Oldsmobile Omega. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Oldsmobile Omega would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Ford Mustang weights approximately 321 kg more than 1977 Oldsmobile Omega.
Because 1996 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1977 Oldsmobile Omega, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1977 Oldsmobile Omega | 1996 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | Oldsmobile | Ford |
| Model | Omega | Mustang |
| Year Released | 1977 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2474 cc | 4942 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 212 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1149 kg | 1470 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4660 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2580 mm |
