1977 Opel Ascona vs. 1996 Seat Alhambra
To start off, 1996 Seat Alhambra is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Opel Ascona. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Opel Ascona would be higher. At 1,984 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Seat Alhambra is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Seat Alhambra weights approximately 825 kg more than 1977 Opel Ascona.
Because 1977 Opel Ascona is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1977 Opel Ascona. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Seat Alhambra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1977 Opel Ascona | 1996 Seat Alhambra | |
Make | Opel | Seat |
Model | Ascona | Alhambra |
Year Released | 1977 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1297 cc | 1984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 114 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 950 kg | 1775 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4330 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2830 mm |