1977 Opel Ascona vs. 2003 Mazda 6
To start off, 2003 Mazda 6 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Opel Ascona. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Opel Ascona would be higher. At 1,989 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mazda 6 weights approximately 430 kg more than 1977 Opel Ascona.
Because 1977 Opel Ascona is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1977 Opel Ascona. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2003 Mazda 6 has automatic transmission and 1977 Opel Ascona has manual transmission. 1977 Opel Ascona will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Mazda 6 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1977 Opel Ascona | 2003 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Opel | Mazda |
Model | Ascona | 6 |
Year Released | 1977 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1297 cc | 1989 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 139 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 950 kg | 1380 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4330 mm | 4690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2680 mm |