1977 Renault 20 vs. 2012 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2012 Jaguar XF is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Renault 20. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Renault 20 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2012 Jaguar XF is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Jaguar XF. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1977 Renault 20, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2012 Jaguar XF has automatic transmission and 1977 Renault 20 has manual transmission. 1977 Renault 20 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Jaguar XF will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1977 Renault 20 | 2012 Jaguar XF | |
Make | Renault | Jaguar |
Model | 20 | XF |
Year Released | 1977 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1993 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 237 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4961 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1877 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1461 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2908 mm |