1977 Renault 20 vs. 2013 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2013 Jaguar XF is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Renault 20. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Renault 20 would be higher. At 5,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jaguar XF weights approximately 595 kg more than 1977 Renault 20.
Because 2013 Jaguar XF is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1977 Renault 20. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XF will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1977 Renault 20 | 2013 Jaguar XF | |
| Make | Renault | Jaguar |
| Model | 20 | XF |
| Year Released | 1977 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1993 cc | 5000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 464 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
| Drive Type | Front | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
| Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 1875 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4961 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 2053 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2909 mm |
