1977 Renault 20 vs. 2013 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2013 Toyota Matrix is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Renault 20. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Renault 20 would be higher. At 1,993 cc (4 cylinders), 1977 Renault 20 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Toyota Matrix weights approximately 5 kg more than 1977 Renault 20.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1977 Renault 20 | 2013 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Renault | Toyota |
Model | 20 | Matrix |
Year Released | 1977 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1993 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 130 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 1285 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4365 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2600 mm |