1977 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow vs. 2005 Skoda Octavia
To start off, 2005 Skoda Octavia is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,748 cc (8 cylinders), 1977 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1977 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow weights approximately 910 kg more than 2005 Skoda Octavia.
Because 1977 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1977 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Skoda Octavia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1977 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | 2005 Skoda Octavia | |
| Make | Rolls-Royce | Skoda |
| Model | Silver Shadow | Octavia |
| Year Released | 1977 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6748 cc | 1968 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 113 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2235 kg | 1325 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 4520 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2520 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.2 L/100km | 8.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 107 L | 55 L |
