1977 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow vs. 2010 Saturn Outlook
To start off, 2010 Saturn Outlook is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,748 cc (8 cylinders), 1977 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1977 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow weights approximately 495 kg more than 2010 Saturn Outlook.
Because 2010 Saturn Outlook is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1977 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Saturn Outlook will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1977 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | 2010 Saturn Outlook | |
| Make | Rolls-Royce | Saturn |
| Model | Silver Shadow | Outlook |
| Year Released | 1977 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6748 cc | 3564 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 288 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2235 kg | 1740 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 5100 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1990 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1780 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 3030 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.2 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 107 L | 83 L |
