1977 Toyota Celica vs. 2010 Chevrolet HHR
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet HHR is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 2,200 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Chevrolet HHR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Chevrolet HHR weights approximately 481 kg more than 1977 Toyota Celica.
Because 1977 Toyota Celica is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1977 Toyota Celica. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet HHR, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1977 Toyota Celica | 2010 Chevrolet HHR | |
| Make | Toyota | Chevrolet |
| Model | Celica | HHR |
| Year Released | 1977 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1588 cc | 2200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 155 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 950 kg | 1431 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4475 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1755 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1603 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2629 mm |
